On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 09:26:29AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote: > On 14.07.20 21:29, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:54:15AM +0200, Frieder Schrempf wrote:
> > > patch in our own tree, or if a node with a custom compatible string like > > > for > > > example "kontron,user-spi" would be accepted upstream, without a matching > > > driver? > > I'm having a hard time getting enthusiastic about it TBH - can you not > > just use spidev and live with the warning? > Ok, I can do that, but when I resend my patches and add "compatible = > 'spidev'" to my DT I expect someone to complain again as my DT does not > describe the hardware. That's the issue with kontron,user-spi too though :/ > But for obvious reasons this can't be considered a good solution and it > seems somewhat disturbing that the maintainer needs to propose it because of > lack of proper solutions ;) Hey, I proposed other solutions you didn't want to implement!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
