> -----Original Message-----
> From: Srinivas Pandruvada <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2020 5:44 AM
> To: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; Pawnikar, Sumeet R
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>; Zhang, Rui
> <[email protected]>; Linux PM <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel
> Mailing List <[email protected]>; Shevchenko, Andriy
> <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] powercap: Add Power Limit4 support
>
> On Tue, 2020-07-14 at 15:21 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
>
> [...]
>
> > On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sumeet Pawnikar
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Srinivas, does the patch look good to you?
>
> Some minor comments then Summet can add my
>
> Reviewed-and-tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <
> [email protected]>
>
Thanks Srinivas for testing this.
I will address your below comment
and submit v3 with above tag.
> > > ---
> > > Changes in v2:
> > > - Addressed review comments from Rafael.
> > > - Made the commit message more clearer.
> > > - Updated powercap documentation.
> > > ---
> > >
>
> [...]
>
> > > 0,1).
> > > +Depending on different power zones, the Intel RAPL technology
> > > allows
> > > +one or multiple constraints like short term, long term and peak
> > > power,
> > > +with different time windows to be applied to each power zone.
> I think better to spell out that time window is not applicable to "peak
> power".
> Otherwise someone will send a bug report.
>
>
> [...]
>
> > > static int rapl_msr_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) {
> > > int ret;
> > > + const struct x86_cpu_id *id =
> > > x86_match_cpu(pl4_support_ids);
>
> To match coding style in this file:
> const struct x86_cpu_id *id = x86_match_cpu(pl4_support_ids);
> int ret;
>
Thanks for review.
Regards,
Sumeet.
> > > rapl_msr_priv.read_raw = rapl_msr_read_raw;
>
> Thanks,
> Srinivas
