On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 12:12:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2020/7/19 上午3:49, Eli Cohen wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 04:57:29PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > >>>Looks like checking intialized is enough. Will fix this. > >>>>>+ > >>>>>+static void mlx5_vdpa_set_vq_ready(struct vdpa_device *vdev, u16 idx, > >>>>>bool ready) > >>>>>+{ > >>>>>+ struct mlx5_vdpa_dev *mvdev = to_mvdev(vdev); > >>>>>+ struct mlx5_vdpa_net *ndev = to_mlx5_vdpa_ndev(mvdev); > >>>>>+ struct mlx5_vdpa_virtqueue *mvq = &ndev->vqs[idx]; > >>>>>+ int err; > >>>>>+ > >>>>>+ if (!mvq->ready && ready && mvq->fw_state != > >>>>>MLX5_VIRTIO_NET_Q_OBJECT_STATE_RDY) { > >>>>>+ err = modify_virtqueue(ndev, mvq, > >>>>>MLX5_VIRTIO_NET_Q_OBJECT_STATE_RDY); > >>>>>+ if (err) { > >>>>>+ mlx5_vdpa_warn(mvdev, "failed to modify > >>>>>virtqueue(%d)\n", err); > >>>>>+ return; > >>>>>+ } > >>>>>+ } > >>>>I wonder what's the reason of changing vq state on the hardware > >>>>here. I think we can defer it to set_status(). > >>>> > >>>I can defer this to set status. > >>> > >>>I just wonder if it is possible that the core vdpa driver may call this > >>>function with ready equals false and after some time call it with ready > >>>equals true. > >> > >>Good point, so I think we can keep the logic. But looks like the > >>code can not work if ready equals false since it only tries to > >>modify vq state to RDY. > >> > >The point is that you cannot modify the virtqueue to "not ready". > > > Is this a hardware limitation of software one?
Sorry, but I was not accruate in my statement above. You can suspend the hardware VQ but you cannot mover out of suspend back to ready. > > I'm asking since we need support live migration. But a questions is > how to stop the device but not reset, since we need get e.g > last_avail_idx from the device. > > It could be either: > > 1) set_status(0) > 2) get_vq_state() > > or > > 1) set_queue_ready(0) > 2) get_vq_state() > This can work. > Set_status(0) means reset the virtio device but last_avail_idx is > something out of virtio spec. I guess using set_queue_ready() is > better. > > What's you opinion? So if the intention to set ready(0) as a preliminary state for live migration then we're ok. We just need to keep in mind that there's no way of suspend but destroy the hardware vq. > > Thanks > > > > The > >only option is to destroy it and create a new one. This means that if I > >get ready equals false after the virtqueue has been created I need to > >teardown the driver and set it up again. > > > >Given that, I think your original suggestion to defer this logic is > >reasonable. > > >