On 7/20/20 9:12 AM, Jordan Niethe wrote:
On Fri, Jul 17, 2020 at 2:11 PM Ravi Bangoria
<ravi.bango...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
So far Book3S Powerpc supported only one watchpoint. Power10 is
introducing 2nd DAWR. Enable 2nd DAWR support for Power10.
Availability of 2nd DAWR will depend on CPU_FTR_DAWR1.
Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bango...@linux.ibm.com>
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h | 4 +++-
arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
index 3445c86e1f6f..36a0851a7a9b 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/cputable.h
@@ -633,7 +633,9 @@ enum {
* Maximum number of hw breakpoint supported on powerpc. Number of
* breakpoints supported by actual hw might be less than this.
*/
-#define HBP_NUM_MAX 1
+#define HBP_NUM_MAX 2
+#define HBP_NUM_ONE 1
+#define HBP_NUM_TWO 2
I wonder if these defines are necessary - has it any advantage over
just using the literal?
No, not really. Initially I had something like:
#define HBP_NUM_MAX 2
#define HBP_NUM_P8_P9 1
#define HBP_NUM_P10 2
But then I thought it's also not right. So I made it _ONE and _TWO.
Now the function that decides nr watchpoints dynamically (nr_wp_slots)
is in different file, I thought to keep it like this so it would be
easier to figure out why _MAX is 2.
#endif /* !__ASSEMBLY__ */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index cb424799da0d..d4eab1694bcd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -5,10 +5,11 @@
* Copyright 2010, IBM Corporation.
* Author: K.Prasad <pra...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
*/
-
Was removing this line deliberate?
Nah. Will remove that hunk.
#ifndef _PPC_BOOK3S_64_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
#define _PPC_BOOK3S_64_HW_BREAKPOINT_H
+#include <asm/cpu_has_feature.h>
+
#ifdef __KERNEL__
struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
unsigned long address;
@@ -46,7 +47,7 @@ struct arch_hw_breakpoint {
static inline int nr_wp_slots(void)
{
- return HBP_NUM_MAX;
+ return cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_DAWR1) ? HBP_NUM_TWO : HBP_NUM_ONE;
So it'd be something like:
+ return cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_DAWR1) ? HBP_NUM_MAX : 1;
But thinking that there might be more slots added in the future, it
may be better to make the number of slots a variable that is set
during the init and then have this function return that.
Not sure I follow. What do you mean by setting number of slots a
variable that is set during the init?
Thanks,
Ravi
