Hi all,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2020 13:02:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the block tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/buffer.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 4f74d15fe408 ("ext4: add inline encryption support")
>
> from the fscrypt tree and commit:
>
> ed9b3196d2b2 ("fs: remove a weird comment in submit_bh_wbc")
>
> from the block tree.
>
>
> diff --cc fs/buffer.c
> index dc5e05b47646,2725ebbcfdc2..000000000000
> --- a/fs/buffer.c
> +++ b/fs/buffer.c
> @@@ -3039,14 -3040,7 +3039,10 @@@ static int submit_bh_wbc(int op, int op
> if (test_set_buffer_req(bh) && (op == REQ_OP_WRITE))
> clear_buffer_write_io_error(bh);
>
> - /*
> - * from here on down, it's all bio -- do the initial mapping,
> - * submit_bio -> generic_make_request may further map this bio around
> - */
> bio = bio_alloc(GFP_NOIO, 1);
> +
> + fscrypt_set_bio_crypt_ctx_bh(bio, bh, GFP_NOIO);
> +
> bio->bi_iter.bi_sector = bh->b_blocknr * (bh->b_size >> 9);
> bio_set_dev(bio, bh->b_bdev);
> bio->bi_write_hint = write_hint;This is now also a conflict between the zonefs tree and the fscrypt tree (since the zonefs tree has merged part of the block tree). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
pgplabmJZksMB.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
