Excerpts from Peter Zijlstra's message of July 24, 2020 12:59 am:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 11:11:03PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> Excerpts from Peter Zijlstra's message of July 23, 2020 9:40 pm:
>> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2020 at 08:56:14PM +1000, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
>> > 
>> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h 
>> >> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> >> index 3a0db7b0b46e..35060be09073 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/hw_irq.h
>> >> @@ -200,17 +200,14 @@ static inline bool arch_irqs_disabled(void)
>> >>  #define powerpc_local_irq_pmu_save(flags)                        \
>> >>    do {                                                   \
>> >>           raw_local_irq_pmu_save(flags);                  \
>> >> -         trace_hardirqs_off();                           \
>> >> +         if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))            \
>> >> +                 trace_hardirqs_off();                   \
>> >>   } while(0)
>> >>  #define powerpc_local_irq_pmu_restore(flags)                     \
>> >>   do {                                                    \
>> >> -         if (raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags)) {           \
>> >> -                 raw_local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);       \
>> >> -                 trace_hardirqs_off();                   \
>> >> -         } else {                                        \
>> >> +         if (!raw_irqs_disabled_flags(flags))            \
>> >>                   trace_hardirqs_on();                    \
>> >> -                 raw_local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);       \
>> >> -         }                                               \
>> >> +         raw_local_irq_pmu_restore(flags);               \
>> >>   } while(0)
>> > 
>> > You shouldn't be calling lockdep from NMI context!
>> 
>> After this patch it doesn't.
> 
> You sure, trace_hardirqs_{on,off}() calls into lockdep.

At least for irq enable/disable functions yes. NMI runs with
interrupts disabled so these will never call trace_hardirqs_on/off
after this patch.

> (FWIW they're
> also broken vs entry ordering, but that's another story).
> 
>> trace_hardirqs_on/off implementation appears to expect to be called in NMI 
>> context though, for some reason.
> 
> Hurpm, not sure.. I'll have to go grep arch code now :/ The generic NMI
> code didn't touch that stuff.
> 
> Argh, yes, there might be broken there... damn! I'll go frob around.
> 

Thanks,
Nick

Reply via email to