On 07/23, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
> So here's a v2, now as a "real" commit with a commit message and everything.

I am already sleeping, will read it tomorrow, but at first glance...

> @@ -1013,18 +1014,40 @@ static int wake_page_function(wait_queue_entry_t 
> *wait, unsigned mode, int sync,
>       if (wait_page->bit_nr != key->bit_nr)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     /* Stop walking if it's locked */
> +     if (wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) {
> +             if (test_and_set_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
> +                     return -1;
> +     } else {
> +             if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
> +                     return -1;
> +     }
> +
>       /*
> -      * Stop walking if it's locked.
> -      * Is this safe if put_and_wait_on_page_locked() is in use?
> -      * Yes: the waker must hold a reference to this page, and if PG_locked
> -      * has now already been set by another task, that task must also hold
> -      * a reference to the *same usage* of this page; so there is no need
> -      * to walk on to wake even the put_and_wait_on_page_locked() callers.
> +      * Let the waiter know we have done the page flag
> +      * handling for it (and the return value lets the
> +      * wakeup logic count exclusive wakeup events).
>        */
> -     if (test_bit(key->bit_nr, &key->page->flags))
> -             return -1;
> +     ret = (wait->flags & WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE) != 0;
> +     wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN;
> +     wake_up_state(wait->private, mode);
>  
> -     return autoremove_wake_function(wait, mode, sync, key);
> +     /*
> +      * Ok, we have successfully done what we're waiting for,
> +      * and we can unconditionally remove the wait entry.
> +      *
> +      * Note that this has to be the absolute last thing we do,
> +      * since after list_del_init(&wait->entry) the wait entry
> +      * might be de-allocated and the process might even have
> +      * exited.
> +      *
> +      * We _really_ should have a "list_del_init_careful()" to
> +      * properly pair with the unlocked "list_empty_careful()"
> +      * in finish_wait().
> +      */
> +     smp_mb();
> +     list_del_init(&wait->entry);

I think smp_wmb() would be enough, but this is minor.

We need a barrier between "wait->flags |= WQ_FLAG_WOKEN" and list_del_init(),

But afaics we need another barrier, rmb(), in wait_on_page_bit_common() for
the case when wait->private was not blocked; we need to ensure that if
finish_wait() sees list_empty_careful() == T then we can't miss WQ_FLAG_WOKEN.

Oleg.

Reply via email to