Hi Bjorn,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: 24 July 2020 00:23
>To: Shiju Jose <[email protected]>
>Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; linux-
>[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
>[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
>[email protected]; [email protected];
>[email protected]; Wangkefeng (OS Kernel Lab)
><[email protected]>; [email protected]; Linuxarm
><[email protected]>; yangyicong <[email protected]>; Jonathan
>Cameron <[email protected]>; tanxiaofei
><[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to notify the vendor
>specific HW errors
>
>On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 11:42:43AM +0100, Shiju Jose wrote:
>> CPER records describing a firmware-first error are identified by GUID.
>> The ghes driver currently logs, but ignores any unknown CPER records.
>> This prevents describing errors that can't be represented by a
>> standard entry, that would otherwise allow a driver to recover from an
>error.
>> The UEFI spec calls these 'Non-standard Section Body' (N.2.3 of
>> version 2.8).
>>
>> patch set
>> 1. add a notifier chain for these non-standard/vendor-records
>>    in the ghes driver.
>>
>> 2. add a driver to handle HiSilicon HIP PCIe controller's errors.
>>
>> Changes:
>>
>> V13:
>> 1. Following changes in the HIP PCIe error handling driver.
>> 1.1 Add Bjorn's acked-by.
>> 1.2. Address the comments and macros order Bjorn mentioned.
>>      Fix the words in the commit.
>
>This series is ill-formed:
>
>  - Jul 22  5:39 Shiju Jose      [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to 
> not
>  - Jul 22  5:39 Shiju Jose      └─>[PATCH v13 1/2] ACPI / APEI: Add a notifier
>  - Jul 22  5:42 Shiju Jose      [PATCH v13 0/2] ACPI / APEI: Add support to 
> not
>  - Jul 22  5:42 Shiju Jose      └─>[PATCH v13 2/2] PCI: hip: Add handling of 
> Hi
git send-email failed to send out one patch each time in the patch series
due to some internal error. 
>
>Patches 1/2 and 2/2 never appear in the same thread.  Both should be replies
>to 0/2.  And should be only *one* v13 0/2, not two :)
>
>Bjorn

Thanks,
Shiju

Reply via email to