On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:32:03 -0700 Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is the need to use the objects per slab in the first part of > __slab_alloc() which is still pretty hot. Copy the number of objects > per slab into the kmem_cache_cpu structure. That way we can get the > value from a cache line that we already need to touch. This brings > the kmem_cache_cpu structure up to 4 even words. > > There is no increase in the size of kmem_cache_cpu since the size of object > is rounded to the next word. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > --- > include/linux/slub_def.h | 1 + > mm/slub.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h > =================================================================== > --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h 2007-10-26 19:09:16.000000000 > -0700 > +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h 2007-10-27 07:55:12.000000000 > -0700 > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_cpu { > int node; > unsigned int offset; > unsigned int objsize; > + unsigned int objects; > }; mutter. nr_objects would be a better name, but then one should rename kmem_cache.objects too. Better would be to comment the field. Please devote extra care to commenting data structures. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/