On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 20:32:03 -0700
Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is the need to use the objects per slab in the first part of
> __slab_alloc() which is still pretty hot. Copy the number of objects
> per slab into the kmem_cache_cpu structure. That way we can get the
> value from a cache line that we already need to touch. This brings
> the kmem_cache_cpu structure up to 4 even words.
>
> There is no increase in the size of kmem_cache_cpu since the size of object
> is rounded to the next word.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> ---
> include/linux/slub_def.h | 1 +
> mm/slub.c | 3 ++-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/slub_def.h 2007-10-26 19:09:16.000000000
> -0700
> +++ linux-2.6/include/linux/slub_def.h 2007-10-27 07:55:12.000000000
> -0700
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct kmem_cache_cpu {
> int node;
> unsigned int offset;
> unsigned int objsize;
> + unsigned int objects;
> };
mutter. nr_objects would be a better name, but then one should rename
kmem_cache.objects too.
Better would be to comment the field. Please devote extra care to commenting
data structures.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
