Hello Martin, On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 09:29:19AM +0200, Martin Botka wrote: > On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 09:12:23PM +0200, Martin Botka wrote: > >> > Note there is already a series that changes these values to u64. See > >> > a9d887dc1c60ed67f2271d66560cdcf864c4a578 in linux-next. > >> > >> Amazing. But isn't there the same issue with it as this one where this > >> would fail to build on 32 bit architecture? > > > > In theory all these cases are coped for. I didn't see any problems yet, > > so I still assume also the 32 bit archs are fine. > > OK then all is fine. I will drop the patch in V2. > > Also Uwe i just realized that you sent the original message and also > this reply only to me and not to anyone else. > Could you please send the messages also to everyone else ?
I hit "reply-to-all" and the mail only was sent to you because you wrote
to only me.
Also threading is somehow strange because your reply to my mail (with
Message-Id: [email protected]
) has
In-Reply-To:
<cadq2g_hkiazx8ohfq_jeizvemab-qn9dfn6tcwfk9xuf97r...@mail.gmail.com>
. So I assume all the strange things happened on your side until proved
otherwise. :-)
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
