From: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com> [ Upstream commit c4c0bdc0d2d084ed847c7066bdf59fe2cd25aa17 ]
Currently, if a bpf program has more than one subprograms, each program will be jitted separately. For programs with bpf-to-bpf calls the prog->aux->num_exentries is not setup properly. For example, with bpf_iter_netlink.c modified to force one function to be not inlined and with CONFIG_BPF_JIT_ALWAYS_ON the following error is seen: $ ./test_progs -n 3/3 ... libbpf: failed to load program 'iter/netlink' libbpf: failed to load object 'bpf_iter_netlink' libbpf: failed to load BPF skeleton 'bpf_iter_netlink': -4007 test_netlink:FAIL:bpf_iter_netlink__open_and_load skeleton open_and_load failed #3/3 netlink:FAIL The dmesg shows the following errors: ex gen bug which is triggered by the following code in arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c: if (excnt >= bpf_prog->aux->num_exentries) { pr_err("ex gen bug\n"); return -EFAULT; } This patch fixes the issue by computing proper num_exentries for each subprogram before calling JIT. Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <y...@fb.com> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <a...@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> --- kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 +++++++++- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 739d9ba3ba6b7..eebdd5307713b 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -9613,7 +9613,7 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) int i, j, subprog_start, subprog_end = 0, len, subprog; struct bpf_insn *insn; void *old_bpf_func; - int err; + int err, num_exentries; if (env->subprog_cnt <= 1) return 0; @@ -9688,6 +9688,14 @@ static int jit_subprogs(struct bpf_verifier_env *env) func[i]->aux->nr_linfo = prog->aux->nr_linfo; func[i]->aux->jited_linfo = prog->aux->jited_linfo; func[i]->aux->linfo_idx = env->subprog_info[i].linfo_idx; + num_exentries = 0; + insn = func[i]->insnsi; + for (j = 0; j < func[i]->len; j++, insn++) { + if (BPF_CLASS(insn->code) == BPF_LDX && + BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_PROBE_MEM) + num_exentries++; + } + func[i]->aux->num_exentries = num_exentries; func[i] = bpf_int_jit_compile(func[i]); if (!func[i]->jited) { err = -ENOTSUPP; -- 2.25.1