[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

So Actually for rt5682 codec Now in 5.8 there are three flags :
SND_SOC_RT5682
SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C
SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW

But till 5.7.8 we have
SND_SOC_RT5682
SND_SOC_RT5682_SDW

So in our design we were using SND_SOC_RT5682 which build snd_soc_rt5682.ko
Creates the respective codec_dais as defined in that .ko

If we use SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C we get snd_soc_rt5682_I2c.ko , it is not creating 
the expected codec_dai links.

As there are three flags defined in codecs, I expect that previous one which we 
were using(SND_SOC_RT5682) is not a wrong flag and I expect to use
SND_SOC_RT5682 as it is still available.

Thanks,
Vishnu


-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Brown <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, July 27, 2020 9:40 PM
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <[email protected]>
Cc: RAVULAPATI, VISHNU VARDHAN RAO <[email protected]>; 
moderated list:SOUND - SOC LAYER / DYNAMIC AUDIO POWER MANAGEM... 
<[email protected]>; Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>; open list 
<[email protected]>; YueHaibing <[email protected]>; Takashi 
Iwai <[email protected]>; Enric Balletbo i Serra <[email protected]>; 
Liam Girdwood <[email protected]>; Mukunda, Vijendar 
<[email protected]>; Deucher, Alexander <[email protected]>; 
Agrawal, Akshu <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] ASoC: amd: SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C does not build rt5682

On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> On 7/27/20 9:58 AM, Ravulapati Vishnu vardhan rao wrote:

> > changing SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C to SND_SOC_RT5682 because, This flag
> > which was previously set as SND_SOC_RT5682 used to build rt5682
> > codec driver but by changing into SND_SOC_RT5682_I2C is preventing
> > to build rt5682 codec driver and machine driver fails to probe.So
> > Reverting the changes.

> The split between I2C and SoundWire means you have to choose the I2C
> or SDW mode. Selecting the common part looks very strange.

Right, and I can't understand the commit message at all.  What's the actual 
issue here and how could this fix it - in what situation wouldn't you need one 
of the bus modules?

Reply via email to