On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:36:51AM +0100, Lukasz Luba wrote: > > In this case I think we would have to create debugfs. > Sudeep do you think these debugfs should be exposed from the protocol > layer: > drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/perf.c
I prefer above over cpufreq as we can support for all the devices not just cpus which avoids adding similar support elsewhere(mostly devfreq) > or maybe from the cpufreq scmi driver? I would probably be safer to have > it in the cpufreq driver because we have scmi_handle there. > Cristian was thinking if we can consolidate all such debugfs under one device may be and that should eliminate your handle restriction. I would like to see how that works out in implementation but I don't have any better suggestion ATM. -- Regards, Sudeep