On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 05:19:03PM +0300, Codrin Ciubotariu wrote:
> Even if I2C bus GPIO recovery is optional, devm_gpiod_get() can return
> -EPROBE_DEFER, so we should at least treat that. This ends up with
> i2c_register_adapter() to be able to return -EPROBE_DEFER.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Codrin Ciubotariu <codrin.ciubota...@microchip.com>
> ---
>  drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> index 4ee29fec4e93..f8d9f2048ca8 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-base.c
> @@ -368,15 +368,16 @@ static int i2c_gpio_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter 
> *adap)
>       return i2c_gpio_init_generic_recovery(adap);
>  }
>  
> -static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
> +static int i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>  {
>       struct i2c_bus_recovery_info *bri = adap->bus_recovery_info;
>       char *err_str;
>  
>       if (!bri)
> -             return;
> +             return 0;
>  
> -     i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap);
> +     if (i2c_gpio_init_recovery(adap) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +             return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>  
>       if (!bri->recover_bus) {
>               err_str = "no recover_bus() found";
> @@ -392,7 +393,7 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>                       if (gpiod_get_direction(bri->sda_gpiod) == 0)
>                               bri->set_sda = set_sda_gpio_value;
>               }
> -             return;
> +             return 0;

This is correct but I think the code flow is/was confusing. Can you drop
this 'return' and use 'else if' for the next code block? I think this is
more readable.

>       }
>  
>       if (bri->recover_bus == i2c_generic_scl_recovery) {
> @@ -407,10 +408,12 @@ static void i2c_init_recovery(struct i2c_adapter *adap)
>               }
>       }
>  
> -     return;
> +     return 0;
>   err:
>       dev_err(&adap->dev, "Not using recovery: %s\n", err_str);
>       adap->bus_recovery_info = NULL;
> +
> +     return 0;

'return -EINVAL;' I'd suggest.

>  }
>  
>  static int i2c_smbus_host_notify_to_irq(const struct i2c_client *client)
> @@ -1476,7 +1479,9 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter 
> *adap)
>                        "Failed to create compatibility class link\n");
>  #endif
>  
> -     i2c_init_recovery(adap);
> +     res = i2c_init_recovery(adap);
> +     if (res == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +             goto out_link;

Please move 'i2c_init_recovery' above the class-link creation. It
shouldn't make a difference but we can skip the extra label and the
ifdeffery.

>  
>       /* create pre-declared device nodes */
>       of_i2c_register_devices(adap);
> @@ -1493,6 +1498,11 @@ static int i2c_register_adapter(struct i2c_adapter 
> *adap)
>  
>       return 0;
>  
> +out_link:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_I2C_COMPAT
> +     class_compat_remove_link(i2c_adapter_compat_class, &adap->dev,
> +                              adap->dev.parent);
> +#endif
>  out_reg:
>       init_completion(&adap->dev_released);
>       device_unregister(&adap->dev);
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to