On 06. 08. 20, 7:44, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The wrappers in include/linux/pci-dma-compat.h should go away.
> 
> The patch has been generated with the coccinelle script below and has been
> hand modified to replace GFP_ with a correct flag.
> It has been compile tested.
> 
> When memory is allocated in 'alloc_desc()' and 'alloc_bufs()', GFP_KERNEL
> can be used because it is only called from a probe function and no lock is
> acquired.
> The call chain is:
>    init_one                    (the probe function)
>       --> device_init
>          --> alloc_dma_bufs
>             --> alloc_desc
>             --> alloc_bufs

Right.

...
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Jiri Slaby <[email protected]>

> ---
> If needed, see post from Christoph Hellwig on the kernel-janitors ML:
>    https://marc.info/?l=kernel-janitors&m=158745678307186&w=4
> ---
>  drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> index b794177ccfb9..1edf06653148 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/synclink_gt.c
> @@ -3341,8 +3341,8 @@ static int alloc_desc(struct slgt_info *info)
>       unsigned int pbufs;
>  
>       /* allocate memory to hold descriptor lists */
> -     info->bufs = pci_zalloc_consistent(info->pdev, DESC_LIST_SIZE,
> -                                        &info->bufs_dma_addr);
> +     info->bufs = dma_alloc_coherent(&info->pdev->dev, DESC_LIST_SIZE,
> +                                     &info->bufs_dma_addr, GFP_KERNEL);
>       if (info->bufs == NULL)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> @@ -3384,7 +3384,8 @@ static int alloc_desc(struct slgt_info *info)
>  static void free_desc(struct slgt_info *info)
>  {
>       if (info->bufs != NULL) {
> -             pci_free_consistent(info->pdev, DESC_LIST_SIZE, info->bufs, 
> info->bufs_dma_addr);
> +             dma_free_coherent(&info->pdev->dev, DESC_LIST_SIZE,
> +                               info->bufs, info->bufs_dma_addr);
>               info->bufs  = NULL;
>               info->rbufs = NULL;
>               info->tbufs = NULL;
> @@ -3395,7 +3396,9 @@ static int alloc_bufs(struct slgt_info *info, struct 
> slgt_desc *bufs, int count)
>  {
>       int i;
>       for (i=0; i < count; i++) {
> -             if ((bufs[i].buf = pci_alloc_consistent(info->pdev, DMABUFSIZE, 
> &bufs[i].buf_dma_addr)) == NULL)
> +             bufs[i].buf = dma_alloc_coherent(&info->pdev->dev, DMABUFSIZE,
> +                                              &bufs[i].buf_dma_addr, 
> GFP_KERNEL);
> +             if (!bufs[i].buf)
>                       return -ENOMEM;
>               bufs[i].pbuf  = cpu_to_le32((unsigned int)bufs[i].buf_dma_addr);
>       }
> @@ -3408,7 +3411,8 @@ static void free_bufs(struct slgt_info *info, struct 
> slgt_desc *bufs, int count)
>       for (i=0; i < count; i++) {
>               if (bufs[i].buf == NULL)
>                       continue;
> -             pci_free_consistent(info->pdev, DMABUFSIZE, bufs[i].buf, 
> bufs[i].buf_dma_addr);
> +             dma_free_coherent(&info->pdev->dev, DMABUFSIZE, bufs[i].buf,
> +                               bufs[i].buf_dma_addr);
>               bufs[i].buf = NULL;
>       }
>  }
> 

thanks,
-- 
js

Reply via email to