On 8/7/20 7:37 PM, Cfir Cohen wrote:
> The LAUNCH_SECRET command performs encryption of the
> launch secret memory contents. Mark pinned pages as
> dirty, before unpinning them.
> This matches the logic in sev_launch_update_data().
>
> Signed-off-by: Cfir Cohen <c...@google.com>
> ---
> Changelog since v1:
>  - Updated commit message.
>
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


Reviewed-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.si...@amd.com>


>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 5573a97f1520..37c47d26b9f7 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -850,7 +850,7 @@ static int sev_launch_secret(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>       struct kvm_sev_launch_secret params;
>       struct page **pages;
>       void *blob, *hdr;
> -     unsigned long n;
> +     unsigned long n, i;
>       int ret, offset;
>  
>       if (!sev_guest(kvm))
> @@ -863,6 +863,14 @@ static int sev_launch_secret(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>       if (!pages)
>               return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * The LAUNCH_SECRET command will perform in-place encryption of the
> +      * memory content (i.e it will write the same memory region with C=1).
> +      * It's possible that the cache may contain the data with C=0, i.e.,
> +      * unencrypted so invalidate it first.
> +      */
> +     sev_clflush_pages(pages, n);
> +
>       /*
>        * The secret must be copied into contiguous memory region, lets verify
>        * that userspace memory pages are contiguous before we issue command.
> @@ -908,6 +916,11 @@ static int sev_launch_secret(struct kvm *kvm, struct 
> kvm_sev_cmd *argp)
>  e_free:
>       kfree(data);
>  e_unpin_memory:
> +     /* content of memory is updated, mark pages dirty */
> +     for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
> +             set_page_dirty_lock(pages[i]);
> +             mark_page_accessed(pages[i]);
> +     }
>       sev_unpin_memory(kvm, pages, n);
>       return ret;
>  }

Reply via email to