Thanks David for the inputs.
On 8/12/2020 2:35 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 11.08.20 14:58, Charan Teja Reddy wrote: >> The following race is observed with the repeated online, offline and a >> delay between two successive online of memory blocks of movable zone. >> >> P1 P2 >> >> Online the first memory block in >> the movable zone. The pcp struct >> values are initialized to default >> values,i.e., pcp->high = 0 & >> pcp->batch = 1. >> >> Allocate the pages from the >> movable zone. >> >> Try to Online the second memory >> block in the movable zone thus it >> entered the online_pages() but yet >> to call zone_pcp_update(). >> This process is entered into >> the exit path thus it tries >> to release the order-0 pages >> to pcp lists through >> free_unref_page_commit(). >> As pcp->high = 0, pcp->count = 1 >> proceed to call the function >> free_pcppages_bulk(). >> Update the pcp values thus the >> new pcp values are like, say, >> pcp->high = 378, pcp->batch = 63. >> Read the pcp's batch value using >> READ_ONCE() and pass the same to >> free_pcppages_bulk(), pcp values >> passed here are, batch = 63, >> count = 1. >> >> Since num of pages in the pcp >> lists are less than ->batch, >> then it will stuck in >> while(list_empty(list)) loop >> with interrupts disabled thus >> a core hung. >> >> Avoid this by ensuring free_pcppages_bulk() is called with proper count >> of pcp list pages. >> >> The mentioned race is some what easily reproducible without [1] because >> pcp's are not updated for the first memory block online and thus there >> is a enough race window for P2 between alloc+free and pcp struct values >> update through onlining of second memory block. >> >> With [1], the race is still exists but it is very much narrow as we >> update the pcp struct values for the first memory block online itself. >> >> [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11696389/ >> > > IIUC, this is not limited to the movable zone, it could also happen in > corner cases with the normal zone (e.g., hotplug to a node that only has > DMA memory, or no other memory yet). Yes, this is my understanding too. I explained the above race in terms of just movable zone for which it is observed. We can add the below line in the end in patch commit message: "This is not limited to the movable zone, it could also happen in cases with the normal zone (e.g., hotplug to a node that only has DMA memory, or no other memory yet)." Just curious, there exists such systems where just a dma zone present and we hot add the normal zone? I am not aware such thing in the embedded world. > >> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <chara...@codeaurora.org> >> --- >> >> v1: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11707637/ >> >> mm/page_alloc.c | 5 +++++ >> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c >> index e4896e6..839039f 100644 >> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c >> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c >> @@ -1304,6 +1304,11 @@ static void free_pcppages_bulk(struct zone *zone, int >> count, >> struct page *page, *tmp; >> LIST_HEAD(head); >> >> + /* >> + * Ensure proper count is passed which otherwise would stuck in the >> + * below while (list_empty(list)) loop. >> + */ >> + count = min(pcp->count, count); >> while (count) { >> struct list_head *list; >> >> > > Fixes: and Cc: stable... tags? Fixes: 5f8dcc21211a ("page-allocator: split per-cpu list into one-list-per-migrate-type") Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> [2.6+] I am not sure If I should have to raise V3 including these? > -- The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
