On Tue, 2020-08-18 at 08:24 +0000, David Laight wrote: > From: Nick Desaulniers > > Sent: 17 August 2020 19:37 > .. > > That said, this libcall optimization/transformation (sprintf->stpcpy) > > does look useful to me. > > I'd rather get a cow if I ask for a cow... > > Maybe checkpatch (etc) could report places where snprintf() > could be replaced by a simpler function.
You mean sprintf no? Reminds me of seq_printf vs seq_puts... https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/16/79
