Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete > and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as > IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be > zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time. > > arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes > needing doing I guess
FRV doesn't use IRQ 0, so using 0 instead is fine. Acked-by: David Howells <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
