The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes needing doing I guess Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/asm-frv//irq.h~ 2007-11-07 16:35:09.927759328 +0000 +++ include/asm-frv/irq.h 2007-11-07 16:35:09.944756744 +0000 @@ -12,9 +12,6 @@ #ifndef _ASM_IRQ_H_ #define _ASM_IRQ_H_ -/* this number is used when no interrupt has been assigned */ -#define NO_IRQ (-1) - #define NR_IRQS 48 #define IRQ_BASE_CPU (0 * 16) #define IRQ_BASE_FPGA (1 * 16) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
