On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 01:47:32PM +0200, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote:
> The endianness has to be fixed to ensure that both sides can
> decode the message. The Little endian format is used according
> to the generic virtio implementation.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliq...@st.com>
> ---
>  drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> index cc2bd47c415a..b478e2b55213 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ enum rpmsg_ns_flags {
>   */
>  struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
>       char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> -     u32 addr;
> -     u32 flags;
> +     __le32 addr;
> +     __le32 flags;
>  } __packed;
>  
>  /**
> @@ -57,8 +57,8 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_channel_announce(struct rpmsg_device 
> *rpdev, int ns_flag)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
>       strncpy(nsm.name, rpdev->id.name, RPMSG_NAME_SIZE);
> -     nsm.addr = rpdev->ept->addr;
> -     nsm.flags = ns_flag;
> +     nsm.addr = cpu_to_le32(rpdev->ept->addr);
> +     nsm.flags = cpu_to_le32(ns_flag);
>  
>       return rpmsg_send_offchannel(rpdev->ept, RPMSG_NS_ADDR, RPMSG_NS_ADDR,
>                                    &nsm, sizeof(nsm));
> @@ -84,6 +84,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void 
> *data, int len,
>       struct rpmsg_device *newch;
>       struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
>       struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> +     unsigned int flags = le32_to_cpu(msg->flags);
>       int ret;
>  
>  #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> @@ -101,13 +102,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void 
> *data, int len,
>  
>       strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
>       chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> -     chinfo.dst = msg->addr;
> +     chinfo.dst = le32_to_cpu(msg->addr);
>  
>       dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> -              msg->flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ? "destroy" : "creat",
> -              msg->name, msg->addr);
> +              flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ? "destroy" : "creat",
> +              msg->name, chinfo.dst);
>  
> -     if (msg->flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> +     if (flags & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
>               ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo);
>               if (ret)
>                       dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);

Please merge this patch to patch 5, I don't see a need for doing this
separately.

Thanks,
Mathieu

> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

Reply via email to