Em Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 03:02:36PM +0530, Kajol Jain escreveu:
> Commit 2ed6edd33a21 ("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()")
> added assignment of ret value as -EAGAIN in case function
> call to 'smp_call_function_single' fails.
> For non-zero ret value, it did
> 'ret = !ret ? data.ret : -EAGAIN;', which always
> assign -EAGAIN to ret and make second if condition useless.
>
> In scenarios like when executing a perf stat with --per-thread option, and
> if any of the monitoring cpu goes offline, the 'smp_call_function_single'
> function could return -ENXIO, and with the above check,
> task_function_call hung and increases CPU
> usage (because of repeated 'smp_call_function_single()')
>
> Recration scenario:
> # perf stat -a --per-thread && (offline a CPU )
Peter, this is kernel stuff, can you take a look?
- Arnaldo
> Patch here removes the tertiary condition added as part of that
> commit and added a check for NULL and -EAGAIN.
>
> Fixes: 2ed6edd33a21("perf: Add cond_resched() to task_function_call()")
> Signed-off-by: Kajol Jain <kj...@linux.ibm.com>
> Reported-by: Srikar Dronamraju <sri...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/events/core.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 5bfe8e3c6e44..330c53f7df9c 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -115,9 +115,9 @@ task_function_call(struct task_struct *p,
> remote_function_f func, void *info)
> for (;;) {
> ret = smp_call_function_single(task_cpu(p), remote_function,
> &data, 1);
> - ret = !ret ? data.ret : -EAGAIN;
> -
> - if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> + if (!ret)
> + ret = data.ret;
> + else if (ret != -EAGAIN)
> break;
>
> cond_resched();
> --
> 2.26.2
>
--
- Arnaldo
