On Fri, 28 Aug 2020 at 01:57, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 21:03, Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org> wrote:
> >
> > The commit d05a7238fe1c ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call
> > dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()") works fine in the case where there is
> > no OPP table. However, if there is an OPP table then
> > dev_pm_opp_of_add_table() will return 0. Since 0 != -ENODEV then the
> > "if (ret != -ENODEV)" will evaluate to true and we'll fall into the
> > error case. Oops.
> >
> > Let's fix this.
> >
> > Fixes: d05a7238fe1c ("mmc: sdhci-msm: Unconditionally call
> > dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table()")
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <diand...@chromium.org>
>
> Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamb...@linaro.org>
>
> I will test this patch and report again on this email thread.
Sorry this patch did not solve the reported problem.
However, I would be testing the V2 set from Viresh Kumar.
and report the test results on the other patch set [1].
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/cover.1598594714.git.viresh.ku...@linaro.org
