On Mon, Sep 07, 2020 at 09:30:37AM +0530, Akshu Agrawal wrote:
> When adding parent clk(mclk) to wclk, this adds fallback option
> for the case where global clk name is used.

> @@ -2780,6 +2780,7 @@ static int rt5682_register_dai_clks(struct 
> snd_soc_component *component)
>                       if (rt5682->mclk) {
>                               init.parent_data = &(struct clk_parent_data){
>                                       .fw_name = "mclk",
> +                                     .name = __clk_get_name(rt5682->mclk),
>                               };
>                               init.num_parents = 1;
>                       }

I don't understand this change - we clearly already have the clock so
why can't we just use whatever we used when we originally looked it up
here?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to