On Tue, Sep 08, 2020 at 01:42:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> The evsel__clone() is to create an exactly same evsel from same
> attributes. Note that metric events will be handled by later patch.
>
> It will be used by perf stat to generate separate events for each
> cgroup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhy...@kernel.org>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index fd865002cbbd..4f50f9499973 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -331,6 +331,63 @@ struct evsel *evsel__new_cycles(bool precise)
> goto out;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * evsel__clone - create a new evsel copied from @orig
> + * @orig: original evsel
> + *
> + * The assumption is that @orig is not configured nor opened yet.
> + * So we only care about the attributes that can be set while it's parsed.
> + */
> +struct evsel *evsel__clone(struct evsel *orig)
> +{
> + struct evsel *evsel;
> + struct evsel_config_term *pos, *tmp;
> +
> + BUG_ON(orig->core.fd);
> +
> + evsel = evsel__new(&orig->core.attr);
> + if (evsel == NULL)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + *evsel = *orig;
this seems wild ;-) I saw that assumption above,
but I wonder we could add some check or zero/init
the rest of the fields fields
jirka
