On 09/01/20 17:49, Shuah Khan wrote:
> Since snprintf() returns would-be-output size instead of the actual
> output size, replace it with scnprintf(), so the show_smt_control(),
> and show_smt_active() routines return the actual size.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <[email protected]>

Looks good to me.

Cheers

--
Qais Yousef

> ---
>  kernel/cpu.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c
> index 6ff2578ecf17..29a5ceb93cda 100644
> --- a/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -2334,7 +2334,7 @@ show_smt_control(struct device *dev, struct 
> device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
>       const char *state = smt_states[cpu_smt_control];
>  
> -     return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
> +     return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%s\n", state);
>  }
>  
>  static ssize_t
> @@ -2348,7 +2348,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(control, 0644, show_smt_control, 
> store_smt_control);
>  static ssize_t
>  show_smt_active(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
>  {
> -     return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
> +     return scnprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "%d\n", sched_smt_active());
>  }
>  static DEVICE_ATTR(active, 0444, show_smt_active, NULL);
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Reply via email to