On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 10:31:03PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> 
> 
> On 09/09/2020 21:50, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 09, 2020 at 07:24:11PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/09/2020 00:43, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>> init_srcu_struct_nodes() is called with is_static==true only internally
> >>> and when this happens, the srcu->sda is not initialized in
> >>> init_srcu_struct_fields() and we crash on dereferencing @sdp.
> >>>
> >>> This fixes the crash by moving "if (is_static)" out of the loop which
> >>> only does useful work for is_static=false case anyway.
> >>>
> >>> Found by syzkaller.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> >>> ---
> >>>  kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 5 +++--
> >>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> >>> index c100acf332ed..49b54a50bde8 100644
> >>> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> >>> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> >>> @@ -135,6 +135,9 @@ static void init_srcu_struct_nodes(struct srcu_struct 
> >>> *ssp, bool is_static)
> >>>                              levelspread[level - 1];
> >>>   }
> >>>  
> >>> + if (is_static)
> >>> +         return;
> >>
> >> Actually, this is needed here too:
> >>
> >>  if (!ssp->sda)
> >>          return;
> >>
> >> as
> >> ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data)
> >>
> >> can fail if the process is killed too soon - it is quite easy to get
> >> this situation with syzkaller (syscalls fuzzer)
> >>
> >> Makes sense?
> > 
> > Just to make sure that I understand, these failures occur when the task
> > running init_srcu_struct_nodes() is killed, correct?
> 
> There are multiple user tasks (8) which open /dev/kvm, do 1 ioctl -
> KVM_CREATE_VM - and terminate, running on 8 vcpus, 8 VMs, crashes every
> 20min or so, less tasks or vcpus - and the problem does not appear.
> 
> 
> > 
> > Or has someone managed to invoke (say) synchronize_srcu() on a
> > dynamically allocated srcu_struct before invoking init_srcu_struct() on
> > that srcu_struct?  
> 
> Nah, none of that :)
> 
> init_srcu_struct_nodes() assumes ssp->sda!=NULL but alloc_percpu() fails
> here:
> 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/mm/percpu.c#n1734
> ===
>       } else if (mutex_lock_killable(&pcpu_alloc_mutex)) {
>                       pcpu_memcg_post_alloc_hook(objcg, NULL, 0, size);
>                       return NULL;
> ===
> 
> I am still up to reading that osr-rcuusage.pdf to provide better
> analysis :) Thanks,

Ah, got it!  Does the following patch help?

There will likely also need to be changes to cleanup_srcu_struct(),
but first let's see if I understand the problem.  ;-)

                                                        Thanx, Paul

------------------------------------------------------------------------

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
index c13348e..6f7880a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
@@ -177,11 +177,13 @@ static int init_srcu_struct_fields(struct srcu_struct 
*ssp, bool is_static)
        INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&ssp->work, process_srcu);
        if (!is_static)
                ssp->sda = alloc_percpu(struct srcu_data);
+       if (!ssp->sda)
+               return -ENOMEM;
        init_srcu_struct_nodes(ssp, is_static);
        ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp = 0;
        ssp->srcu_last_gp_end = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
        smp_store_release(&ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed, 0); /* Init done. */
-       return ssp->sda ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC

Reply via email to