On 9/10/20 1:14 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2020 at 08:58:53PM -0700,
[email protected] wrote:
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <[email protected]>
pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
pcie_ports_native is unset.
Also, since struct pci_host_bridge ->native_* members caches the
ownership status of various PCIe capabilities, use them instead
of distributed checks for pcie_ports_native.
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
<[email protected]>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/pci-acpi.c | 3 --
drivers/pci/pcie/aer.c | 2 +-
drivers/pci/pcie/portdrv_core.c | 9 ++---
5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
index f90e841c59f5..f8981d4e044d 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
@@ -145,6 +145,17 @@ static struct pci_osc_bit_struct pci_osc_control_bit[] = {
{ OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL, "DPC" },
};
+ else
+ dev_warn(&bus->dev, "OS overrides %s firmware control",
+ get_osc_desc(OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL));
There's got to be a way to write this more concisely. Maybe something
like this?
#define OSC_OWNER(ctrl, bit, flag) \
if (!(ctrl & bit)) \
flag = 0;
if (pcie_ports_native)
decode_osc_control(root, "OS forcibly taking over", ~0);
BIT1 and BIT6 does not have PCIe dependency. And BIT7-31 are reserved.
So we can't force all _OSC bits based on pcie_ports_native value.
So, IM0, its better to handle PCIe features seperatly.
else {
ctrl = root->osc_control_set;
OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_aer);
OSC_OWNER(ctrl, OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL, host_bridge->native_pme);
...
}
--
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
Linux Kernel Developer
