On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 17:19:20 +0200 Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Montag, 14. September 2020 14:43:25 CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > > > So yes, looks like this also requires changes to the 9pfs 'local' fs > > > driver on QEMU side: > > > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07586.html > > > > > > Eric, Greg, would there be an easy way to establish QEMU test cases > > > running > > > the 9pfs 'local' fs driver? Right now we only have 9pfs qtest cases for > > > QEMU which can only use the 'synth' driver, which is not helpful for such > > > kind of issues. > > > > I guess it's possible to introduce new qtests that start QEMU with > > -fsdev local instead of -fsdev synth... I haven't looked in a while > > though, so I won't comment on "easy way" ;-) > > Makes sense, and I considered that approach as well. > > The question is the following: is there a QEMU policy about test cases that > create/write/read/delete *real* files? I.e. should those test files be > written > to a certain location, and are there measures of sandboxing required? > I don't know. You'll need to figure out by yourself, reading code from other tests or asking on IRC. > Best regards, > Christian Schoenebeck > >
