On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 13:06:34 +0200 Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> wrote:
> On Montag, 14. September 2020 10:35:46 CEST Greg Kurz wrote: > > On Mon, 14 Sep 2020 11:37:50 +0800 > > > > Jianyong Wu <jianyong...@arm.com> wrote: > > > open-unlink-f*syscall bug is a well-known bug in 9p, we try to fix the bug > > > in this patch set. > > > I take Eric's and Greg's patches which constiute the 1/4 - 3/4 of this > > > patch set as the main frame of the solution. In patch 4/4, I fix the fid > > > race issue exists in Greg's patch. > > > > IIRC some patches were needed on the QEMU side as well... I'm spending > > less time on 9pfs in QEMU, so Cc'ing the new maintainer: > > > > Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_...@crudebyte.com> > > AFAICS this is about this old bug report: > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1336794 > Correct. > So yes, looks like this also requires changes to the 9pfs 'local' fs driver > on > QEMU side: > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2016-06/msg07586.html > > Eric, Greg, would there be an easy way to establish QEMU test cases running > the 9pfs 'local' fs driver? Right now we only have 9pfs qtest cases for QEMU > which can only use the 'synth' driver, which is not helpful for such kind of > issues. > I guess it's possible to introduce new qtests that start QEMU with -fsdev local instead of -fsdev synth... I haven't looked in a while though, so I won't comment on "easy way" ;-) > Best regards, > Christian Schoenebeck > >