On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 12:37 AM Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote: > > > I completely understand but you didn't answer my question. How come > > there are drivers which create netdev objects, and specifically sgi-xp > > in misc (but I also saw it in usb drivers) that live outside > > drivers/net ? Why doesn't your request apply to them as well ? > > When we wrote the code, we saw those examples and therefore assumed it was > > fine. > > commit 45d9ca492e4bd1522d1b5bd125c2908f1cee3d4a > Author: Dean Nelson <d...@sgi.com> > Date: Tue Apr 22 14:46:56 2008 -0500 > > [IA64] move XP and XPC to drivers/misc/sgi-xp > > Move XPC and XPNET from arch/ia64/sn/kernel to drivers/misc/sgi-xp. > > Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <d...@sgi.com> > Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.l...@intel.com> > > It has been there a long time, and no networking person was involved > in its move. > > drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_ncm.c > commit 00a2430ff07d4e0e0e7e24e02fd8adede333b797 > Author: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrze...@samsung.com> > Date: Tue Jul 15 13:09:46 2014 +0200 > > usb: gadget: Gadget directory cleanup - group usb functions > > The drivers/usb/gadget directory contains many files. > Files which are related can be distributed into separate directories. > This patch moves the USB functions implementations into a separate > directory. > > Signed-off-by: Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrze...@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <ba...@ti.com> > > Again, old. > > Can you find an example of a network driver added in the last couple > of years outside of drivers/met? I honestly don't know and I admit we didn't look at the dates of when these drivers were introduced. Oded
> > > > > > Please make sure to CC linux-rdma. You clearly stated that the device > > > > > does RDMA-like transfers. > > > > > > > > We don't use the RDMA infrastructure in the kernel and we can't > > > > connect to it due to the lack of H/W support we have so I don't see > > > > why we need to CC linux-rdma. > > > > > > You have it backward. You don't get to pick and choose which parts of > > > the infrastructure you use, and therefore who reviews your drivers. > > > The device uses RDMA under the hood so Linux RDMA experts must very > > > much be okay with it getting merged. That's how we ensure Linux > > > interfaces are consistent and good quality. > > > > I understand your point of view but If my H/W doesn't support the > > basic requirements of the RDMA infrastructure and interfaces, then > > really there is nothing I can do about it. I can't use them. > > It is up to the RDMA people to say that. They might see how the RDMA > core can be made to work for your hardware. > > Andrew
