Hi Prabhakar,
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 06:42:34PM +0100, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> Add support to read the bus-type for V4L2_MBUS_BT656 and
> enable BT.656 mode in the sensor if needed.
Here we should be concerned about retro-compatibility, as a new bus
type is added. I would move the comment you had in 1/3 to this patch.
Otherwise the code flow looks ok: if no bus-type is specified assume
parallel as it was the only supported bus type at the time.
If someone wants BT.656 it has to be a new DTS and then the bus-type
property is mandatory.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad...@bp.renesas.com>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das...@bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c b/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> index 4ab4b3c883d0..869f2d94faec 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ov772x.c
> @@ -583,6 +583,13 @@ static int ov772x_s_stream(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, int
> enable)
> if (priv->streaming == enable)
> goto done;
>
> + if (priv->bus_type == V4L2_MBUS_BT656) {
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, COM7, ITU656_ON_OFF,
> + enable ? ITU656_ON_OFF :
> ~ITU656_ON_OFF);
> + if (ret)
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> ret = regmap_update_bits(priv->regmap, COM2, SOFT_SLEEP_MODE,
> enable ? 0 : SOFT_SLEEP_MODE);
> if (ret)
> @@ -1436,9 +1443,17 @@ static int ov772x_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse(ep, &bus_cfg);
> priv->bus_type = bus_cfg.bus_type;
> v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_free(&bus_cfg);
> + if (ret) {
> + bus_cfg = (struct v4l2_fwnode_endpoint)
> + { .bus_type = V4L2_MBUS_BT656 };
> + ret = v4l2_fwnode_endpoint_alloc_parse(ep, &bus_cfg);
If you really want to keep using alloc_parse() you should remember to
endpoint_free() here.
> + if (ret) {
> + fwnode_handle_put(ep);
> + goto error_clk_put;
> + }
> + priv->bus_type = bus_cfg.bus_type;
> + }
> fwnode_handle_put(ep);
I would assign priv->bus_type here.
Also, this has grown quite a bit, have you considered making a
ov772x_parse_dt() function ?
With this last changes I think we're good to go. I'll send tags on
the next version!
Thank you for your perseverance
> - if (ret)
> - goto error_clk_put;
>
> ret = ov772x_video_probe(priv);
> if (ret < 0)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
