We should probably print what the expected chip-ID is. We already have
that information available, based on the device specified via
device-tree.

Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardel...@analog.com>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
index 8a6682b567be..f068256cfca9 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad9467.c
@@ -390,7 +390,8 @@ static int ad9467_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 
        id = ad9467_spi_read(spi, AN877_ADC_REG_CHIP_ID);
        if (id != conv->chip_info->id) {
-               dev_err(&spi->dev, "Unrecognized CHIP_ID 0x%X\n", id);
+               dev_err(&spi->dev, "Mismatch CHIP_ID, got 0x%X, expected 
0x%X\n",
+                       id, conv->chip_info->id);
                return -ENODEV;
        }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to