On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 05:31:28PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:35:55PM +0000, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > Ciphers produce invalid results on BE.
> > Key and IV need to be written in LE.
> > Furthermore, the non-optimized function is too complicated to convert,
> > let's simply fallback on BE for the moment.
> >
> > Fixes: 6298e948215f2 ("crypto: sunxi-ss - Add Allwinner Security System
> > crypto accelerator")
> > Cc: <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Corentin Labbe <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../crypto/allwinner/sun4i-ss/sun4i-ss-cipher.c | 17 +++++++++++------
> > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> Does the BE failure get caught by the selftest?
>
Yes, selftest found it.
> If so please just leave it enabled so that it can be fixed properly.
Not sure to leave it enabled is a good idea.
A least, leaving it failing probably will not annoy any user (according to my
readings of #linux-sunxi, nobody use BE).
But I think only me will see it and since I already have this on my TODO list,
I dont see any interest to leave it failing.
Furthermore, having a clean BE boot will permit to enable BE boots for thoses
SoCs on kernelCI.
Regards
