Hi Marek,
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 22.09.2020 01:15, Alex Goins wrote:
> > Tested-by: Alex Goins <ago...@nvidia.com>
> >
> > This change fixes a regression with drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() and
> > AMDGPU in v5.9.
>
> Thanks for testing!
>
> > Commit 39913934 similarly revamped AMDGPU to use sgtable helper functions.
> > When
> > it changed from dma_map_sg_attrs() to dma_map_sgtable(), as a side effect it
> > started correctly updating sgt->nents to the return value of
> > dma_map_sg_attrs().
> > However, drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() incorrectly uses sgt->nents to
> > iterate over pages, rather than sgt->orig_nents, resulting in it now
> > returning
> > the incorrect number of pages on AMDGPU.
> >
> > I had written a patch that changes drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() to use
> > for_each_sgtable_sg() instead of for_each_sg(), iterating using
> > sgt->orig_nents:
> >
> > - for_each_sg(sgt->sgl, sg, sgt->nents, count) {
> > + for_each_sgtable_sg(sgt, sg, count) {
> >
> > This patch takes it further, but still has the effect of fixing the number
> > of
> > pages that drm_prime_sg_to_page_addr_arrays() returns. Something like this
> > should be included in v5.9 to prevent a regression with AMDGPU.
>
> Probably the easiest way to handle a fix for v5.9 would be to simply
> merge the latest version of this patch also to v5.9-rcX:
> https://lore.kernel.org/dri-devel/20200904131711.12950-3-m.szyprow...@samsung.com/
Tested-by: Alex Goins <ago...@nvidia.com> that version too.
>
> This way we would get it fixed and avoid possible conflict in the -next.
> Do you have any AMDGPU fixes for v5.9 in the queue? Maybe you can add that
> patch to the queue?
I don't have any more AMDGPU fixes, just want to ensure that this makes it in.
Thanks,
Alex
> Dave: would it be okay that way?
>
> Best regards
> --
> Marek Szyprowski, PhD
> Samsung R&D Institute Poland
>
>
