On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:22:12PM +0200, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote: > While testing hotplug I got this BUG:
> > It was caused by printk() inside a code section protected by a > raw_spin_lock() that ended up calling a serial console that > uses a regular spin_lock(). > > Use the printk_deferred() to avoid calling the serial console > in a raw_spin_lock() protected section. I consider printk_deferred() to be a bug, can't we just wait for the new printk implementation to land so we don't need all this nonsense?
