On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 09:12:11AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 02:44:57PM +0200, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > index 6b0f4c88b07c..90515c04d90a 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
> > @@ -316,7 +316,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leave_mm);
> >  
> >  int enable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  {
> > -   int cpu, ret = 0, i;
> > +   int i;
> >  
> >     /*
> >      * Do not enable L1D_FLUSH_OUT if
> > @@ -329,7 +329,7 @@ int enable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >                     !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D))
> >             return -EINVAL;
> >  
> > -   cpu = get_cpu();
> > +   get_cpu();
> >  
> >     for_each_cpu(i, &tsk->cpus_mask) {
> >             if (cpu_data(i).smt_active == true) {
> > @@ -340,7 +340,7 @@ int enable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
> >  
> >     set_ti_thread_flag(&tsk->thread_info, TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH);
> >     put_cpu();
> > -   return ret;
> > +   return 0;
> >  }
> 
> If you don't use the return value of get_cpu(), then change it over to
> preempt_{dis,en}able(), but this got me looking at the function, wtf is
> that garbage supposed to do in the first place
> 
> What do we need to disable preemption for?
> 
> Please explain the desired semantics against sched_setaffinity().

Here, I fixed it..

---
 arch/x86/mm/tlb.c | 24 +++---------------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
index 6b0f4c88b07c..f02a2f1909da 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/tlb.c
@@ -316,31 +316,13 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(leave_mm);
 
 int enable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
 {
-       int cpu, ret = 0, i;
-
-       /*
-        * Do not enable L1D_FLUSH_OUT if
-        * b. The CPU is not affected by the L1TF bug
-        * c. The CPU does not have L1D FLUSH feature support
-        * c. The task's affinity is on cores with SMT on.
-        */
-
        if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_L1TF) ||
-                       !static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D))
+           !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D) ||
+           sched_smt_active());
                return -EINVAL;
 
-       cpu = get_cpu();
-
-       for_each_cpu(i, &tsk->cpus_mask) {
-               if (cpu_data(i).smt_active == true) {
-                       put_cpu();
-                       return -EINVAL;
-               }
-       }
-
        set_ti_thread_flag(&tsk->thread_info, TIF_SPEC_L1D_FLUSH);
-       put_cpu();
-       return ret;
+       return 0;
 }
 
 int disable_l1d_flush_for_task(struct task_struct *tsk)

Reply via email to