From: Kirill A. Shutemov <kir...@shutemov.name>
[ Upstream commit c3e5ea6ee574ae5e845a40ac8198de1fb63bb3ab ]
Jeff Moyer has reported that one of xfstests triggers a warning when run
on DAX-enabled filesystem:
WARNING: CPU: 76 PID: 51024 at mm/memory.c:2317 wp_page_copy+0xc40/0xd50
...
wp_page_copy+0x98c/0xd50 (unreliable)
do_wp_page+0xd8/0xad0
__handle_mm_fault+0x748/0x1b90
handle_mm_fault+0x120/0x1f0
__do_page_fault+0x240/0xd70
do_page_fault+0x38/0xd0
handle_page_fault+0x10/0x30
The warning happens on failed __copy_from_user_inatomic() which tries to
copy data into a CoW page.
This happens because of race between MADV_DONTNEED and CoW page fault:
CPU0 CPU1
handle_mm_fault()
do_wp_page()
wp_page_copy()
do_wp_page()
madvise(MADV_DONTNEED)
zap_page_range()
zap_pte_range()
ptep_get_and_clear_full()
<TLB flush>
__copy_from_user_inatomic()
sees empty PTE and fails
WARN_ON_ONCE(1)
clear_page()
The solution is to re-try __copy_from_user_inatomic() under PTL after
checking that PTE is matches the orig_pte.
The second copy attempt can still fail, like due to non-readable PTE, but
there's nothing reasonable we can do about, except clearing the CoW page.
Reported-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Jeff Moyer <jmo...@redhat.com>
Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Justin He <justin...@arm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com>
Link:
http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200218154151.13349-1-kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org>
---
mm/memory.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 9ea917e28ef4e..2157bb28117ac 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2163,7 +2163,7 @@ static inline bool cow_user_page(struct page *dst, struct
page *src,
bool ret;
void *kaddr;
void __user *uaddr;
- bool force_mkyoung;
+ bool locked = false;
struct vm_area_struct *vma = vmf->vma;
struct mm_struct *mm = vma->vm_mm;
unsigned long addr = vmf->address;
@@ -2188,11 +2188,11 @@ static inline bool cow_user_page(struct page *dst,
struct page *src,
* On architectures with software "accessed" bits, we would
* take a double page fault, so mark it accessed here.
*/
- force_mkyoung = arch_faults_on_old_pte() && !pte_young(vmf->orig_pte);
- if (force_mkyoung) {
+ if (arch_faults_on_old_pte() && !pte_young(vmf->orig_pte)) {
pte_t entry;
vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, addr, &vmf->ptl);
+ locked = true;
if (!likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
/*
* Other thread has already handled the fault
@@ -2216,18 +2216,37 @@ static inline bool cow_user_page(struct page *dst,
struct page *src,
* zeroes.
*/
if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ if (locked)
+ goto warn;
+
+ /* Re-validate under PTL if the page is still mapped */
+ vmf->pte = pte_offset_map_lock(mm, vmf->pmd, addr, &vmf->ptl);
+ locked = true;
+ if (!likely(pte_same(*vmf->pte, vmf->orig_pte))) {
+ /* The PTE changed under us. Retry page fault. */
+ ret = false;
+ goto pte_unlock;
+ }
+
/*
- * Give a warn in case there can be some obscure
- * use-case
+ * The same page can be mapped back since last copy attampt.
+ * Try to copy again under PTL.
*/
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- clear_page(kaddr);
+ if (__copy_from_user_inatomic(kaddr, uaddr, PAGE_SIZE)) {
+ /*
+ * Give a warn in case there can be some obscure
+ * use-case
+ */
+warn:
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
+ clear_page(kaddr);
+ }
}
ret = true;
pte_unlock:
- if (force_mkyoung)
+ if (locked)
pte_unmap_unlock(vmf->pte, vmf->ptl);
kunmap_atomic(kaddr);
flush_dcache_page(dst);
--
2.25.1
