From: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonak...@gmail.com> [ Upstream commit eb5760863fc28feab28b567ddcda7e667e638da0 ]
We already has similar code in ext4_mb_complex_scan_group(), but ext4_mb_simple_scan_group() still affected. Other reports: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ext4/msg60231.html Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adil...@dilger.ca> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Monakhov <dmonak...@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310150156.641-1-dmonak...@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <ty...@mit.edu> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sas...@kernel.org> --- fs/ext4/mballoc.c | 11 +++++++++-- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c index e1782b2e2e2dd..e5d43d2ee474d 100644 --- a/fs/ext4/mballoc.c +++ b/fs/ext4/mballoc.c @@ -1901,8 +1901,15 @@ void ext4_mb_simple_scan_group(struct ext4_allocation_context *ac, BUG_ON(buddy == NULL); k = mb_find_next_zero_bit(buddy, max, 0); - BUG_ON(k >= max); - + if (k >= max) { + ext4_grp_locked_error(ac->ac_sb, e4b->bd_group, 0, 0, + "%d free clusters of order %d. But found 0", + grp->bb_counters[i], i); + ext4_mark_group_bitmap_corrupted(ac->ac_sb, + e4b->bd_group, + EXT4_GROUP_INFO_BBITMAP_CORRUPT); + break; + } ac->ac_found++; ac->ac_b_ex.fe_len = 1 << i; -- 2.25.1
