Roughly went through the patch, looks good, here comes the remind, though :-)
1. is it possible to use some name other than "soc_core", maybe "tmio_core" so that other multifunction chips sharing a core base will live easier. 2. those C++ style comments "//" are not so pleasant... - eric On Nov 21, 2007 6:20 AM, ian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 01:04 +0300, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > Just to note, that there is an alternative implementation for at least > > the tc6393 chip devices. Most current version of those patches can be > > found in the OpenEmbedded monotone. > > Yes, this is true. The core code in both cases originates from my and > Dirks work. > > I'd just like to get something pushed up to mainline so that work can > begin on expanding the number of chips supported. > > This would include the ASICs found in many iPAQ PDAs (their MMC module > seems to be an IRQ-less TMIO chip). > > I havent submitted the subdevice drivers yet, only the base/core > drivers. > > The OE versions probably have better USB and video subdevice support > (which I shall evaluate as I go on), wheras the NAND flash and MMC > drivers in hh.org are probably more up to date (I run root on SD usinf > the hh.org tmio_mmc driver on all three of the MFD chips in this patch > series on a daily basis). > > merging the best of these patch series is my goal and it shouldnt be too > hard. > > > > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > -- Cheers - eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/