On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:10:00PM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Make name service module transport agnostic by using the rpmsg
> device specific byte conversion routine.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poir...@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c | 10 ++++------
> include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> index b3318bf84433..1df3aaadfe10 100644
> --- a/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> +++ b/drivers/rpmsg/rpmsg_ns.c
> @@ -18,9 +18,7 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void
> *data, int len,
> struct rpmsg_ns_msg *msg = data;
> struct rpmsg_device *newch;
> struct rpmsg_channel_info chinfo;
> - struct virtio_rpmsg_channel *vch = to_virtio_rpmsg_channel(rpdev);
> - struct virtproc_info *vrp = vch->vrp;
> - struct device *dev = &vrp->vdev->dev;
> + struct device *dev = &rpdev->dev;
> int ret;
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> @@ -38,13 +36,13 @@ static int rpmsg_ns_cb(struct rpmsg_device *rpdev, void
> *data, int len,
>
> strncpy(chinfo.name, msg->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
> chinfo.src = RPMSG_ADDR_ANY;
> - chinfo.dst = virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->addr);
> + chinfo.dst = rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->addr);
>
> dev_info(dev, "%sing channel %s addr 0x%x\n",
> - virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> + rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY ?
> "destroy" : "creat", msg->name, chinfo.dst);
>
> - if (virtio32_to_cpu(vrp->vdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> + if (rpmsg32_to_cpu(rpdev, msg->flags) & RPMSG_NS_DESTROY) {
> ret = rpmsg_release_channel(rpdev, &chinfo);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "rpmsg_destroy_channel failed: %d\n", ret);
> diff --git a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> index aabc6c3c0d6d..9f3030b2145b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> +++ b/include/linux/rpmsg_ns.h
> @@ -41,8 +41,8 @@ struct rpmsg_hdr {
> */
> struct rpmsg_ns_msg {
> char name[RPMSG_NAME_SIZE];
> - __virtio32 addr;
> - __virtio32 flags;
> + u32 addr;
> + u32 flags;
These aren't (necessarily) native endianness, right? Don't they deserve a
separate type? __rpmsg32?
Thanks
Guennadi
> } __packed;
>
> /**
> --
> 2.25.1
>
