Hi Thomas,
On 9/30/2020 11:32 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15 2020 at 16:27, Dave Jiang wrote:
@@ -1303,9 +1303,10 @@ static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct
intel_ir_data *data,
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSI:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_PCI_MSIX:
+ case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI:
if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET)
set_hpet_sid(irte, info->devid);
- else
+ else if (info->type != X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI)
set_msi_sid(irte,
msi_desc_to_pci_dev(info->desc));
Gah. this starts to become unreadable.
hmm ok will change it.
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
index 8f4ce72570ce..0c1ea8ceec31 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c
@@ -1271,6 +1271,16 @@ static struct irq_chip intel_ir_chip = {
.irq_set_vcpu_affinity = intel_ir_set_vcpu_affinity,
};
+static void irte_prepare_msg(struct msi_msg *msg, int index, int subhandle)
+{
+ msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
+ msg->data = sub_handle;
+ msg->address_lo = MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO | MSI_ADDR_IR_EXT_INT |
+ MSI_ADDR_IR_SHV |
+ MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX1(index) |
+ MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX2(index);
+}
+
static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct intel_ir_data *data,
struct irq_cfg *irq_cfg,
struct irq_alloc_info *info,
@@ -1312,19 +1322,18 @@ static void intel_irq_remapping_prepare_irte(struct
intel_ir_data *data,
break;
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET:
+ set_hpet_sid(irte, info->hpet_id);
+ irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
+ break;
+
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_MSI:
case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_MSIX:
- if (info->type == X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_HPET)
- set_hpet_sid(irte, info->hpet_id);
- else
- set_msi_sid(irte, info->msi_dev);
-
- msg->address_hi = MSI_ADDR_BASE_HI;
- msg->data = sub_handle;
- msg->address_lo = MSI_ADDR_BASE_LO | MSI_ADDR_IR_EXT_INT |
- MSI_ADDR_IR_SHV |
- MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX1(index) |
- MSI_ADDR_IR_INDEX2(index);
+ set_msi_sid(irte, info->msi_dev);
+ irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
+ break;
+
+ case X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_DEV_MSI:
+ irte_prepare_msg(msg, index, sub_handle);
break;
default:
Hmm?
ok so I have no clue what happened here. This was the patch that was
sent out:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/160021246905.67751.1674517279122764758.st...@djiang5-desk3.ch.intel.com/
and this does not have the above change. Not sure what happened here.
Anyways, this should not be there.
Thanks,
tglx
