DaveJ's Fedora 8 rpm for 2.6.24 works petty well, except for the
neworking related lockdep assert attached below, which happened while
starting up ipsec. Let me know if you need any more info - it's a pretty
stock setup.
Ingo
=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.24-0.39.rc3.git1.fc9 #1
-------------------------------------------------------
ip/25091 is trying to acquire lock:
(&x->lock){-+..}, at: [<c06330d6>] copy_to_user_state_extra+0x1a/0x156
but task is already holding lock:
(xfrm_state_lock){-+..}, at: [<c06308d2>] xfrm_state_walk+0x1e/0xb9
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #1 (xfrm_state_lock){-+..}:
[<c044dc17>] __lock_acquire+0xa7c/0xc4d
[<c044e262>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9e
[<c064147d>] _spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x5d
[<c062eabf>] xfrm_state_lookup+0x1e/0x45
[<c06317c0>] xfrm_alloc_spi+0xbc/0x17c
[<c063505d>] xfrm_alloc_userspi+0xe5/0x168
[<c0633de7>] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0xba/0xcd
[<c05ee161>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x30/0x82
[<c06338d7>] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x1e/0x2b
[<c05edf35>] netlink_unicast+0x19f/0x208
[<c05ee762>] netlink_sendmsg+0x279/0x285
[<c05cd303>] sock_aio_write+0xe8/0xf4
[<c049360e>] do_sync_write+0xc5/0x102
[<c0493e2a>] vfs_write+0xbc/0x15c
[<c049447d>] sys_write+0x3d/0x61
[<c0405252>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
-> #0 (&x->lock){-+..}:
[<c044db07>] __lock_acquire+0x96c/0xc4d
[<c044e262>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9e
[<c064147d>] _spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x5d
[<c06330d6>] copy_to_user_state_extra+0x1a/0x156
[<c06337c4>] dump_one_state+0xb9/0x138
[<c063090d>] xfrm_state_walk+0x59/0xb9
[<c0633bbf>] xfrm_dump_sa+0x3f/0x4f
[<c05ed306>] netlink_dump+0x52/0x16a
[<c05ef1ae>] netlink_dump_start+0x104/0x141
[<c0633d99>] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x6c/0xcd
[<c05ee161>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x30/0x82
[<c06338d7>] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x1e/0x2b
[<c05edf35>] netlink_unicast+0x19f/0x208
[<c05ee762>] netlink_sendmsg+0x279/0x285
[<c05cda10>] sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0xfd
[<c05ce34b>] sys_sendto+0xcc/0xec
[<c05ceb98>] sys_socketcall+0x16b/0x241
[<c0405252>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
other info that might help us debug this:
3 locks held by ip/25091:
#0: (xfrm_cfg_mutex){--..}, at: [<c06338cb>] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x12/0x2b
#1: (nlk->cb_mutex){--..}, at: [<c05ed2ee>] netlink_dump+0x3a/0x16a
#2: (xfrm_state_lock){-+..}, at: [<c06308d2>] xfrm_state_walk+0x1e/0xb9
stack backtrace:
[<c040649a>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x2f
[<c0406d46>] show_trace+0x12/0x14
[<c0406e51>] dump_stack+0x16/0x18
[<c044c069>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x5f/0x68
[<c044db07>] __lock_acquire+0x96c/0xc4d
[<c044e262>] lock_acquire+0x7b/0x9e
[<c064147d>] _spin_lock_bh+0x33/0x5d
[<c06330d6>] copy_to_user_state_extra+0x1a/0x156
[<c06337c4>] dump_one_state+0xb9/0x138
[<c063090d>] xfrm_state_walk+0x59/0xb9
[<c0633bbf>] xfrm_dump_sa+0x3f/0x4f
[<c05ed306>] netlink_dump+0x52/0x16a
[<c05ef1ae>] netlink_dump_start+0x104/0x141
[<c0633d99>] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x6c/0xcd
[<c05ee161>] netlink_rcv_skb+0x30/0x82
[<c06338d7>] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x1e/0x2b
[<c05edf35>] netlink_unicast+0x19f/0x208
[<c05ee762>] netlink_sendmsg+0x279/0x285
[<c05cda10>] sock_sendmsg+0xe0/0xfd
[<c05ce34b>] sys_sendto+0xcc/0xec
[<c05ceb98>] sys_socketcall+0x16b/0x241
[<c0405252>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
=======================
NET: Unregistered protocol family 15
NET: Registered protocol family 15
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
