On Fri, Nov 23, 2007 at 04:38:51PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> DaveJ's Fedora 8 rpm for 2.6.24 works petty well, except for the
> neworking related lockdep assert attached below, which happened while
> starting up ipsec. Let me know if you need any more info - it's a pretty
> stock setup.
Thanks for the report Ingo!
This is indeed a regression caused by:
commit 050f009e16f908932070313c1745d09dc69fd62b
Author: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue Oct 9 13:31:47 2007 -0700
[IPSEC]: Lock state when copying non-atomic fields to user-space
For 2.6.24 I'm simply going to revert this change since that
just puts us back to the same state we've been for the last
few years.
For 2.6.25 I'll do a proper fix by making sure that every xfrm
state user obeys the rule that if x->lock is to be taken with
xfrm_state_lock then it must be done from within.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
