On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 01:23:53PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Oct 05, 2020 at 12:49:17PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Detect calls to schedule() between user_enter() and user_exit(). Those > > are symptoms of early entry code that either forgot to protect a call > > to schedule() inside exception_enter()/exception_exit() or, in the case > > of HAVE_CONTEXT_TRACKING_OFFSTACK, enabled interrupts or preemption in > > a wrong spot. > > > > Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frede...@kernel.org> > > Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosa...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paul...@kernel.org> > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org> > > Cc: Phil Auld <pa...@redhat.com> > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> > > --- > > kernel/sched/core.c | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c > > index 2d95dc3f4644..d31a79e073e3 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/core.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c > > @@ -4295,6 +4295,7 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct task_struct > > *prev, bool preempt) > > preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED); > > } > > rcu_sleep_check(); > > + WARN_ON_ONCE(ct_state() == CONTEXT_USER); > > SCHED_WARN_ON() ?
Bah! That's exactly what I was looking for. > No point in unconditionally polluting that path. Although, per MeL, we > should probably invest in CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG_I_MEANS_IT :/ Because CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG is often used by default on distros? Thanks.