On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:45:16PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszew...@baylibre.com> > > The preferred coding style is to order all includes alphabetically for > improved readability. There's no need for the configfs header to come > last.
Is it? People seem to have all kinds of weird opinions, but I don't think any ordering really makes sense. What does make sense it dropping the pointless empty line, so I've folded that into the next patch.
