On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, 9:41am, Daniel Wagner wrote: > When the fcport is about to be deleted we should return EBUSY instead > of ENODEV. Only for EBUSY the request will be requeued in a multipath > setup. > > Also in case we have a valid qpair but the firmware has not yet > started return EBUSY to avoid dropping the request. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Wagner <dwag...@suse.de> > --- > > v2: rebased on mkp/staging > > drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c | 5 ++++- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c > index 2cd9bd288910..fded1e3bc9e0 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/qla2xxx/qla_nvme.c > @@ -555,8 +555,11 @@ static int qla_nvme_post_cmd(struct nvme_fc_local_port > *lport, > > fcport = qla_rport->fcport; > > - if (!qpair || !fcport || (qpair && !qpair->fw_started) || > + if ((qpair && !qpair->fw_started) || > (fcport && fcport->deleted)) > + return -EBUSY; > + > + if (!qpair || !fcport) > return -ENODEV; > > vha = fcport->vha; >
Please move up the "(!qpair || !fcport)" check; you can avoid the qpair/fcport check in the first "if" condition, then. Regards, -Arun
