On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 5:42 AM Jürgen Groß <jgr...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 14.10.20 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > Moving XEN_512GB allows it to nest under XEN_PV. That also allows > > XEN_PVH to nest under XEN as a sibling to XEN_PV and XEN_PVHVM giving: > > > > [*] Xen guest support > > [*] Xen PV guest support > > [*] Limit Xen pv-domain memory to 512GB > > [*] Xen PV Dom0 support > > This has currently a wrong text/semantics: > > It should be split to CONFIG_XEN_DOM0 and CONFIG_XEN_PV_DOM0. > > Otherwise the backends won't be enabled per default for a PVH-only > config meant to be Dom0-capable. > > You don't have to do that in your patches if you don't want to, but > I wanted to mention it with you touching this area of Kconfig.
Yes, good point. I had not considered that. > > [*] Xen PVHVM guest support > > [*] Xen PVH guest support > > > > Signed-off-by: Jason Andryuk <jandr...@gmail.com> > > Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com> Thanks, Jason
