On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 4:10 AM Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote: > > On 14.10.2020 19:53, Jason Andryuk wrote: > > @@ -76,7 +80,9 @@ config XEN_DEBUG_FS > > Enabling this option may incur a significant performance overhead. > > > > config XEN_PVH > > - bool "Support for running as a Xen PVH guest" > > + bool "Xen PVH guest support" > > Tangential question: Is "guest" here still appropriate, i.e. > isn't this option also controlling whether the kernel can be > used in a PVH Dom0?
Would you like something more generic like "Xen PVH support" and "Support for running in Xen PVH mode"? > > def_bool n > > And is this default still appropriate? We probably want to flip it on, yes. PVH is the future, isn't it? Regards, Jason
