On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 02:41:29PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> The hook is used to parse memory-regions and load resource table
> from the address the remote processor published.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <[email protected]>
> ---
>  drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 97 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> index 48ce09e857ee..bd3a42892b22 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/imx_rproc.c
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
>  #include <linux/module.h>
>  #include <linux/of_address.h>
> +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
>  #include <linux/of_device.h>
>  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>  #include <linux/regmap.h>
> @@ -243,10 +244,106 @@ static void *imx_rproc_da_to_va(struct rproc *rproc, 
> u64 da, size_t len)
>       return va;
>  }
>  
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_alloc(struct rproc *rproc,
> +                            struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +     struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
> +     void *va;
> +
> +     dev_dbg(dev, "map memory: %p+%zx\n", &mem->dma, mem->len);
> +     va = ioremap_wc(mem->dma, mem->len);
> +     if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(va)) {
> +             dev_err(dev, "Unable to map memory region: %p+%zx\n",
> +                     &mem->dma, mem->len);
> +             return -ENOMEM;
> +     }
> +
> +     /* Update memory entry va */
> +     mem->va = va;
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_mem_release(struct rproc *rproc,
> +                              struct rproc_mem_entry *mem)
> +{
> +     dev_dbg(rproc->dev.parent, "unmap memory: %pa\n", &mem->dma);
> +     iounmap(mem->va);
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(struct rproc *rproc)
> +{
> +     struct imx_rproc *priv = rproc->priv;
> +     struct device_node *np = priv->dev->of_node;
> +     struct of_phandle_iterator it;
> +     struct rproc_mem_entry *mem;
> +     struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> +     int index = 0;
> +     u32 da;
> +
> +     /* Register associated reserved memory regions */
> +     of_phandle_iterator_init(&it, np, "memory-region", NULL, 0);
> +     while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> +             /*
> +              * Ignore the first memory region which will be used vdev 
> buffer.
> +              * No need to do extra handlings, rproc_add_virtio_dev will 
> handle it.
> +              */
> +             if (!index && !strcmp(it.node->name, "vdevbuffer")) {
> +                     index ++;

How many vdevs is there in your scenario?  Since most of this code is taken from
stm32 anyway I would suggest to use "vdev0buffer" and get rid of the "index 
++".  It
adds needless complexity and doesn't pass the checkpatch test.

With the above:
Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <[email protected]>

> +                     continue;
> +             }
> +
> +             rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> +             if (!rmem) {
> +                     dev_err(priv->dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
> +
> +             /* No need to translate pa to da, i.MX use same map */
> +             da = rmem->base;
> +
> +             /* Register memory region */
> +             mem = rproc_mem_entry_init(priv->dev, NULL, 
> (dma_addr_t)rmem->base, rmem->size, da,
> +                                        imx_rproc_mem_alloc, 
> imx_rproc_mem_release,
> +                                        it.node->name);
> +
> +             if (mem)
> +                     rproc_coredump_add_segment(rproc, da, rmem->size);
> +             else
> +                     return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +             rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> +             index++;
> +     }
> +
> +     return  0;
> +}
> +
> +static int imx_rproc_parse_fw(struct rproc *rproc, const struct firmware *fw)
> +{
> +     int ret = imx_rproc_parse_memory_regions(rproc);
> +
> +     if (ret)
> +             return ret;
> +
> +     ret = rproc_elf_load_rsc_table(rproc, fw);
> +     if (ret)
> +             dev_info(&rproc->dev, "No resource table in elf\n");
> +
> +     return 0;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct rproc_ops imx_rproc_ops = {
>       .start          = imx_rproc_start,
>       .stop           = imx_rproc_stop,
>       .da_to_va       = imx_rproc_da_to_va,
> +     .load           = rproc_elf_load_segments,
> +     .parse_fw       = imx_rproc_parse_fw,
> +     .find_loaded_rsc_table = rproc_elf_find_loaded_rsc_table,
> +     .sanity_check   = rproc_elf_sanity_check,
> +     .get_boot_addr  = rproc_elf_get_boot_addr,
>  };
>  
>  static int imx_rproc_addr_init(struct imx_rproc *priv,
> -- 
> 2.28.0
> 

Reply via email to